Travelers United spoke at the FTC open meeting on junk fees … two years ago.


The FTC announced public hearings on junk fees two years ago.


junk feesThe Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina M. Khan announced an open meeting of the Commission two years ago:

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on Junk Fees. The Commission will vote on whether to issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to initiate a rulemaking proceeding addressing junk fees charged for goods or services with little or no added value to the consumer. The ANPRM seeks comments on the prevalence of junk fees and the consumer harms arising from junk fee practices, among other questions. These “Junk Fees” (often called drip pricing) include hotel resort fees, entertainment fees like those charged by Ticketmaster, and banking fees. They harm consumers to the tune of billions of dollars.

Travelers United, together with other consumer advocacy groups, will participate. As President of the advocacy group, I will speak at the meeting. We have been waiting for almost two years for these rules regarding mandatory hotel junk fee rules and resort fees.

My comments follow as a reminder to the FTC as they close out their time to propose rules:

Irritated by hotel resort fees?Travelers United applauds the FTC decision to discuss launching an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Junk Fees. We have worked with the FTC for over a decade to stop the scourge of hidden mandatory fees. The FTC studied drip pricing with fees added to the advertised rates. Drip pricing harms American consumers to the tune of billions of dollars.

Once upon a time, these fees were not even disclosed to customers until the purchase of hotel rooms, entertainment tickets, autos, banking transactions, and more. A decade ago, the FTC conducted a significant review of these fees in the lodging industry. The FTC sent a letter to hotel chains and informed them that the drip pricing practice was against the law and would prosecute them without fee disclosure.

Many hotels add a line to their website and ads after the room rates, saying, “Additional mandatory fees may be added to this room rate.” Thus, consumers are notified.

Later, after much nudging from Travelers United and significant media, the lodging industry added the actual mandatory fees after the room rates. Many consumers believe they have paid the complete overnight charges when websites run their credit cards.

Advertisements still include the room rates without mandatory fees. And now, this cruel practice has spread to vacation rentals, banking, and the entertainment industry. We are all aware of the throw-away comment, “Plus, mandatory fees and taxes.”

The DOT recently announced an NPRM about ancillary airline fees. It will require the industry to be honest in its pricing. Now, the FTC is following DOT actions to what they refer to as junk fees or drip pricing.

It is about time that America’s consumers may again enjoy truth in advertising.


Other proposed rulemaking discussions at this public FTC meeting will include the following:

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Fake Reviews and Endorsements: The Commission will vote on whether to issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to initiate a rulemaking proceeding addressing fake reviews and other endorsements. This can cheat consumers and honest businesses alike. The ANPR seeks comment on the prevalence of fake and deceptive reviews. It also asks for comments on the consumer harms arising from them and other questions.

I spoke with two commission members working on this proposed rule. Together, they said to wait until they had released the rule and to study. Just a reminder — our lawyers, other consumer advocates, and we are waiting,


Join Our Membership Program TodayREAD ALSO:
Why airline full-disclosure rules won’t solve all travelers’ fee frustration.
As hotel travel recovers, rein in mandatory hotel resort fees.


Previous

Next