Chris Elliott’s series on the DOT proposed rulemaking — the most complete overview available on the Web

Chris Elliott has written this series of posts in order to make sense of the Transportation Department’s (DOT’s) proposed rules and offer the most informed feedback during its commenting period. Comments will be accepted until August 9th. Please take a moment to read the rulemaking and then tell the government what you think at Regulationroom.org.

Please participate in the DOT outreach. You ‘ll have to register and learning the site takes about 5 minutes, then site users have a direct line to DOT. This is a time that ordinary citizens can have their voices heard in Washington. Let DOT know what you think about each of these issues in the rulemaking.

The regulationroom.org website is organized by topics so that users can focus on one portion of the rulemaking at a time and make their comments heard. DOT is also monitoring the website and responding to comments and questions raised by airline passengers.

Part 1: New tarmac delay contingency plans — what’s in it for you?

Part 2: Government will require airlines to offer “complete picture” of ground delays

• Part 3: New rules would require airlines to meet “minimum” customer service standards

Part 4: Government to airlines: Put it in the contract!

Part 5: New requirements would force international airlines to monitor and respond to passenger complaints

Part 6: Everything you need to know about the new denied boarding compensation rules

Part 7: The truth about the government’s new “full fare” disclosure rule

Part 8: Transportation Department wants airlines to reveal all fees and an airfare — or two

Part 9: New rule: No more price increases after you buy a ticket

Part 10: Airlines must “promptly” notify passengers of flight delays under proposed rule

Part 11: No more lawsuit limits for passengers under proposed government rules

Part 12: The hard facts about the peanuts-on-a-plane rule everyone’s talking about This part of the rulemaking has been removed by DOT because of jurisdictional issues.

Previous

Next